Arabpsynet

Points de Vue  /  Points of View

ÔÈßÉ ÇáÚáæã ÇáäÝÓíÉ ÇáÚÑÈíÉ

 

Intifada : A psychological Profile

Walid Sarhan,M.D.& Jamal Al-Khatib,M.D.

Al-Rashid Psychiatric Hospital

E-mail: sarhan@joinnet.com.jo

 

    Intifada is a term used to describe the Palestinian uprising against the Israeli occupation, was first used in 1987 when children threw stones on the Israeli soldiers, who fired back and bombed the civilians.

 

    The first Intifada was stopped by the Oslo peace agreement, that the Palestinians accepted, but the Israelis never withdrew as agreed.

 

    Last September, after several years of negotiations, Mr. Sharon the opposition Leukud leader walked into Al-Aqssa mosque, guarded by the army and police, in a test of the reaction of the Palestinian people, after the failure of Camp David talks. As a popular reaction of the people of Palestine after long winded peace talk efforts and feeling of despair, and the Israelis have proved they are against any peaceful settlement and indications that the Palestinians will not get back any rights, as previously promised by the international community over the years.

 

    The second Palestinian Intifada (September 2001) is different from the first one (1987-1993) in many aspects. But two very important aspects are 1- the extensive satellite coverage of Intifada and 2- the presence of the leadership in the ground of Israeli aggressive missions (battlefield). The medias' instant broadcast has exerted great influence on public opinion everywhere. The scene of the cold blooded murder of child Mohamad Al-Durrah by an Israeli soldier who is still on the loose, and despite trial of wrapping up the event by some TV channels, poses one example of this effect.

 

    The scenario of 'security', which the Israeli election campaigns had repeatedly emphasized, had recently culminated in the election of a war criminal to lead the political establishment in this military oriented state. Psychologically speaking, security is the main worry of inflowing immigrants during the past 50 years, whereby many previous pacts have not ensured secure borders for those who habitated the land of Palestine.

 

    In the current Intifada, the Israelis imagine that every Palestinian Arab is a potential bomb, through their own military mindedness perpetrated by continued drilling and training of young and middle aged men and women in Israeli military camps, as a result of which they harvest in their souls severe anxiety and fear through day and night. Accordingly, a very high percentage of the Israeli population is on Anxiolytics, not as treatment of anxiety disorders only, but also for the treatment of ideological, existential and situational disturbances.

 

    Martyristic or suicidal operations against Israeli targets has broken all security barriers and challenged all bombings, armed insurgents from fortified Jewish settlements and tank sweeps overrunning Palestinian lives, possessions, olive trees and buildings. The dilemma that is facing the Israeli mentality revolves around the question: "How could one face an 'enemy' who does not care about death?". The question becomes burdensome when the Israeli hear about young men rushing to enlist for such operations. All this continues despite an existent great disparity between a high-tech Israeli armament and a relatively armless Palestinian people.

 

    With regard to current world affairs, as portrayed by communication media at large, we find that people in general believe in the way they perceive facts rather than in the facts themselves, spiting the truth if it ever appears later. This phenomenon is highlighted by events in the current Intifada by the Palestinians.

 

    We observe how certain publicity media manipulate events, censor words and montage scenarios with creation of perverted accounts of what had happened in reality. Falsification of events also involves an industry of packaging and marketing manipulated news and views, for instance, turning and Israeli army with a highly sophisticated weaponry, which maintains and unprecedented siege of a whole population in their own cities, towns and villages for many months, into a picture of a defense organ which is attempting to maintain security against the 'aggressor' Palestinians, who in turn do not even possess the equivalent or even simple defensive tools. Moreover, while fully trained Jewish settlers rave through towns and villages of Palestinians, haphazardly shooting, killing and wrecking Palestinian property, those very people appear on some information media as crying women and children at a set-back after any retaliation event by the Palestinians. All the aforesaid efforts, toward manipulation of facts, comes in the direction of the masses, and falls under the blanket of what has been called psychological warfare. The latter is a weapon which has been strongly used by the Israeli authorities ever since this second Intifada began, albeit all times prior to that. Psychological warfare aims at invading and affecting the mind rather anything else, under the pretext that eventually, winning or losing is a mental state. This weapon has been used in wars to convince the 'enemy' that whatever they will do cannot work, with the hope of implanting fear in both fighters in the battlefield and workers in diplomatic corps as much as in the targeted population, the ultimate aim of which is surrender. The common method used in psychological warfare is a direct attack on the mind with manipulation of input in order to deceive senses and perception, thereby recruiting illusive concepts and attitudes. For example, the term ' occupied territories' (to say the least) is expressed by warring psychologists as 'disputed territories' , or even just 'the territories'. This very example highlight the allusiveness and creation of vagueness about fairness and justice. On the one hand, when a Palestinian infant like "Aya Hijjo" is murdered in her own cot by Israeli rockets fired at civilian quarters, this is portrayed as accidental. On the other hand, when a 42-year-old Israeli Moshe is killed, he is portrayed as a farmer and a father of two children. But the killed Palestinian, whoever is, remains a number. In a different tune, statement are made such as: "The Palestinians launch a terrorist attack and the Israelis retaliate or fire back". So, who started it all? How all this started becomes a matter of public rhetoric rather than a matter of humanity, discrimination and occupation.      

 

    What is more illusive or even delusional comes into light when the Israelis justify many months of a tight siege with impoverishment of hundreds of thousands of people, including children, adult and elderly, justify all this as an act of self defense. The most important psychological mission of the Israelis and their allies and corresponding media appears to concentrate on how to embrace facts, manipulate and pack them, then insert them into the minds of many good people with creation of delusional ideas about mutual violence and terrorism rather than admit the Palestinian plight in their current Intifada as an attempt for liberation against foreign occupation and colonialism in the form of Zionism.

 

So as to publish all pages in 3 languages

 Please participate in the translation of this article in French and Arabic and send it to the Arabic edition or the French edition

 

Document Code VP.0011

Sarh.Katib-Intif.psyPro 

ÊÑãíÒ ÇáãÓÊäÏ VP.0011

 

Copyright ©2003  WebPsySoft ArabCompany, www.arabpsynet.com  (All Rights Reserved)

 

 

ÊÜÞÜíÜíÜÜãÜÜß áåÜÜÐÇ ÇáÈÍÜÜË

****

  ***

**

*